Minnesota Orchestra

Previous Posts

Archives

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]

Blog Policies

Sarah Hicks and Sam Bergman

Monday, November 9, 2009

Pushing The Limits

Last week, the Minnesota Orchestra played what will probably stand as the most difficult and exhausting program we'll perform in this entire season. There were four major works to be gotten through, each one hugely challenging in its own way, and for a lot of us, it was our first time playing three of the four.

One of the dirty little secrets of professional orchestras is that the reason we're able to crank out reasonably good performances of an ever-changing array of repertoire (think about it - do you know of a theater company or string quartet that mounts 50-70 completely different programs every year, with just three or four rehearsals for each?) is that we already know most of it pretty well. Sure, it might take a few minutes for the particular intricacies of Brahms or Stravinsky to slip back under your fingers, but it's the same notes you played the last time that particular piece crossed your stand, and after a few years in the profession, you've got a pretty good handle on 75-80% of the core repertoire you'll be playing for the rest of your career.

So if muscle memory and simple musical recall are an orchestra musician's best friends, then a program full of world premieres and obscure works from the past would seem to be our worst enemy. But for most of us, that's not the case at all. Yes, there are musicians who would rather just slog through the same old familiar warhorses and pick up their paycheck while putting in as little effort as possible, but for most of us, new challenges keep the work fresh, and the chance to attack a score we've never seen before is deeply satisfying, assuming that the music in question is quality stuff.

The world premiere we played last week was by a composer we've gotten to know well during Osmo's time in Minnesota, and whenever we see his name on the schedule, we know we'll all need to sign out our parts weeks in advance of the first rehearsal. Kalevi Aho's music is rich and distinctive, well-constructed and obviously composed with a deep understanding of the orchestra and its various components, but it is also invariably at the absolute outer edge of playability for nearly every instrument. In the days leading up to an Aho week, musicians are constantly wandering up to each other backstage, saying things like, "I mean, have you looked at page 14? The hell am I supposed to do with that?"

Still, the satisfaction I get from practicing new music that pushes me to my limits has always been one of the things that thrills me most about playing music for a living. Back in my college days, the Contemporary Music Ensemble was the group that all the best players wanted to be in, not because most of us believed that the music was somehow better than Beethoven or Brahms, but because once you can play Stockhausen, or Carter, or Wuorinen, you know you can play anything. And that's a powerful realization.

Last Friday night, I was asked to speak to a group of the orchestra's most loyal supporters before the concert, and give a bit of a preview of the music they'd be hearing that evening. Mr. Aho was present for this event, and in the course of describing the piece we'd been working on, I took the chance to address the composer directly. I told him that the first piece of his I'd ever played was his Insect Symphony, and that, at the time, it was the most difficult thing I'd ever played in an orchestra. "That was four years ago," I said. "Now, that symphony isn't even in my top five, and those other five are also all yours."

The incredible thing about Aho, though, is that music that is so fiendishly difficult for those of us on stage can sound so natural and comprehensible out in the audience. There are a lot of composers today writing music that's so difficult that it can barely be played. Most of them do it on purpose, hoping that, by stressing out the performers, they'll create a sense of urgency and chaotic panic in the music that the audience will instantly be able to sense.

Aho, on the other hand, reminds me more of Stravinsky - he must know that the music he's writing will fall beyond the capabilities of all but the finest musicians of his era, but he's not necessarily writing just for us. The musicians who first played some of Stravinsky's now-famous ballet scores called them unplayable, but I've been playing them with no great discomfort or stress since my college days. I fully expect (and I'm guessing Aho does, too) that the musicians of the late 21st century will find Aho's symphonies no more challenging than I find The Rite of Spring. I only wish I could be around to hear them...

Labels: , ,

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Sam,

As I was watching and listening to the world premiere of the Aho last Thursday, I became curious how far in advance the orchestra musicians actually receive and start practicing these new pieces. Practically the entire orchestra was out on stage warming up 15-20 minutes ahead of the concert, and I could see many, many members of the orchestra counting during the performance, so it was obviously a VERY difficult piece.

Having said that, it really came together. And what a great piece it is. Usually after these premieres the applause seems more polite, than genuine, but not for this piece. The audience seemed absolutely thrilled with it, as was I.

A wonderfully uncommon and brilliant program. Interesting how the program got shuffled after the Thursday show. Excellent job to all concerned on this one!

November 9, 2009 at 6:37 PM  
Blogger Sam said...

Glad you liked the piece! I liked it too, a lot, and as coincidence would have it, my hot-off-the-press copy of Aho's new viola concerto arrived in the mail just as our premiere week was ending! (It looks to be quite the project, but we all need something to keep us busy over the winter months, right?)

The answer to your question is that, in most situations, our librarians try to have parts available to us two weeks before we start rehearsals for a concert. In this case, the viola parts for the Aho didn't make it to the folders until a little less than a week in advance, due to last-minute bowing changes and other unavoidable delays. So there was a bit of a scramble in the days leading up to the first rehearsal.

Interesting thing about the program order change - I was strongly in favor of it, because on Thursday night, I found it very hard to settle my mind down to play the Stravinsky right after the Aho, because they're both so complex, but in different ways. The Crusell, which followed Aho on the other nights, is so hugely different (and easier) that it was an easier transition. But my mother, who was at all three concerts, says that she preferred the original order. Different strokes...

November 9, 2009 at 6:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

An Aho viola concerto...interesting...should be something to look forward to! You're the soloist in that I presume?

Is this month possibly a record for number of world premieres at Orchestra Hall? Another one this week, and 3 more the week after that. I love it!

November 9, 2009 at 7:54 PM  
Blogger Sam said...

I'd certainly love to perform it somewhere at some point, but section players don't get asked to play concertos very often, and I'm just learning it because I heard the recording of the premiere and thought it was a great piece. It's always nice to have something new and challenging to practice.

If MN Orch were to play it, I'd imagine the honor of the solo part would go to our excellent principal, Tom Turner, who incidentally, is part of a MN Orch ensemble that will be recording Aho's clarinet quintet next spring. (Yes, Osmo's on clarinet.)

November 9, 2009 at 8:08 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home